The CON of the Constitution Part 1

The CON of the Constitution, are you a slave to it? Part 1
is published on Facebook by James Freed : https://www.facebook.com/notes/james-freed/the-con-of-the-constitution-are-you-a-slave-to-it-part-1/154027328095079

Are you being pulled into a battle that has already been decided?  Have you ever wondered why the push to bankrupt all nations recently?  Are you being deceived to believe you have rights and protections under the constitution?  By claiming the constitution, do you willingly put yourself unto subjection and have to petition “pray” to a king “sovereign?god”?  Are you intertwined so deep that you are very much a part of MAMMON and not even realize it?  For those who that have the stomach to seek TRUTH and not be hypnotized by the magi and their diviners teaching deceit, then this is for you.  Thank you to Stephen Ames and R.E. Southerland for their in depth overview and format to make this easy to begin one’s own research to find we have been lied to and how the founding fathers were/are a fraud and a sell out. Read at your own risk, for your life will change after reading this.  I have one challenge to all, prove it wrong.  But be careful, for it will be easier to go back to sleep than to view what is contained after this…

Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:

S.I. 1997 NO. 1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made

22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham

Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty in pursuance of section

179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers

enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order,

and it is hereby ordered as follows:

“This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997

and shall come into force on 1st September 1997.”

Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice stating in court

that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social

Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.

Remember, King George was the “Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman

Empire and of the United States of America.” See: Treaty of Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes

at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA

‘plantation.’

What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and King George were

working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central

Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you

have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before

the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15).

Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King of England, he was

also the King of France. Treaty of Peace (1738) * U.S. 8 Statutes at Large 80.

On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the repayment of 21 loans that the

UNITED STATES had already received dating from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782.

Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King money that is due January 1, 1788 from

King George via France. Is this not incredible that the King funded both sides of the

War? But there was more work that needed to be done. Now the Articles of

Confederation which was declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 ” All bills

of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of

Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present

confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United States, for

payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby

solemnly pledged.”

Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was nothing more than a

move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they were not done yet.

Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland,

to discuss the economic instability of the country under the Articles of Confederation.

Only five States came to the meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place

in Philadelphia the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of

Confederation

On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take place in

Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of confederation. Something had to

be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know that the so-called founding

fathers were acutely going to reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt.

On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approved the Constitution. The States

have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple

agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt. Blacks Law

Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the

people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it

was never put to them for a vote. On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was

titled –

An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This

can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and

purposes abolished the States and created the Districts. If you don’t believe it look it up.

The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we’ve got two. In this Act each

District was assigned a portion of the debt.

The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790.

This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The

original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the

governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby

binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the

State where they resided and ipso facto (by the fact itself) a citizen of the United States.

A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject.

What you think is a State is in reality a Corporation, in other words, a Person (artificial-

person).

“Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person.” 9 F. Supp 272″ Word “person” does not

include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.

There are no States, just Corporations. Every body politic on this planet is a Corporation.

A Corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They

are images in your mind that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our

children to a fiction.

Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.

Article Six Section One keeps the loans from the King valid it states; All Debts

contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall

be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section Eight clause Two that

states “Congress has the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States”. This

was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could

borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would

also be liable for it.

The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in 1791. This

was a private Bank (just like the Federal Reserve Bank) of which there were 25,000

shares issued of which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the

United States money in exchange for Securities of the United States.

Now the creditors of the United States, which included the King, wanted to be paid the

Interest on the loans that were given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came

up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent

out the Militia to collect the tax, which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey

rebellion. It is the Militia’s duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes

from the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I’ll tell you how. The

people are slaves! The United States belongs to the “floundering” fathers and their

posterity and Great Britain.

America is nothing more than a Plantation. It always has been. How many times have

you seen someone in court attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he

can’t. It is because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!! If you don’t believe it

read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14

Georgia 438, 520 which states, “But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain,

by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true,

is a compact but he is not a party to it.”

Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause (15) that states that it

is the Militia’s job to execute the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16). It states that

Congress has the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia,

and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United

States. The Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is there to collect our substance.

As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military Government to guard

the King’s commerce and make us slaves.

If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find “The Treaty of Amity,

Commerce and Navigation”. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794, which

was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King’s Troops were

still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was, he decided that the

troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil

because, quite frankly the King wanted them here.

Here is the key to were this started:

Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs the entire

world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT

SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:

“Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel. Every town and country

must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment’s of the

Talmudic sages, because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in

Talmud. The sages who adopted the enactments and decrees, instituted the practices,

rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of

Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the entire Torah in

unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher.”

We are living under what the Bible calls MAMMON. As written in the subject Index,

Mammon is defined as (“Civil law and procedure”).

Now turn to the “The Shetars Effect on English Law” — A Law of the Jews Becomes the

Law of the Land, found in “The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200.”

It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are the property of the Norman and

Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains

how the Babylonian Talmud became the law of the land, which is now known as the

Uniform Commercial Code. The written credit agreement — the Jewish Shetar is a lien

on all property (realty) and today it’s called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that

Great Britain owns the Jews and the Jews are in charge of the Baking system.

We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is where all of our problems originate. It

was brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the

Christian churches ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people are taught to

believe in things that do not exist.

Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I’m sorry people, you are not a

party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of

a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party

to it.” Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga.

438, 520.

You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United States and

the States are the parties to the Constitution not you.

Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a

warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget

about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you take

him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case dismissed. Why?

Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a government official for not

adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the

fact that you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a

CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why? Because you are attempting to

infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make matters worse you

are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your

Masters property! Here are just a couple of examples:

“The primary control and custody of an infant is with the government” Tillman V.

Roberts. 108 So. 62

” Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and

the State.” Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual so-called “ownership”

is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting to mere user; and use must be in

accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document

No. 43 73rdCongress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because

you are a slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor.

“The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute inalienable right, is

one which has never existed since governments were instituted, and never can exist under

government.” Wynehamer v. The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481

Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS is not an

Agency of the United States Government. All taxpayers have an Individual Master File

that is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a

blocking series that shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most taxpayers

fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is reserved, but by going to BMF

300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax

Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a business and involved in commerce and are

held liable for taxes via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K.

The form that is supposed to be used for this is Form 8288, IRPTA-Foreign Investment

Real Property Tax Account. The 8288 Form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the

IRS, chapter 3. The OMB’s-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department

of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork

Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says

U.S. withholding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288,

#8288a.

These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309, Barred

Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for the 1040 form.

IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty

Claims. Isn’t it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a payment of a tax to the U.K.?

Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the law that makes one liable for the so-

called Income Tax but, it is not in there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection

through a private contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section

One and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets

connected to its udders? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns property

or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor has ever

produced. You don’t even own your labor or yourself.

Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a small portion

of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most of all, breed more

slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other slaves get upset if you try to retain

your labor? You are called an extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They

say that you are anti-government.

When the truth of the matter is you just don’t want to be a slave. But, you do not have the

right to force others to be free if they want to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they

want bow down and worship corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and

the Pope are not the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the want-to-be-

slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope would not even exist,

because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter of fact, think that those who are

in power are also tired of the slaves. All the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For

free healthcare, free education, free housing and they beg those who are in power to

disarm them. I do agree that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How can you

disagree with the government passing out birth control? I hope the breeding of slaves

stops or at the very least slows down.

You see we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United States Inc.

is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm

in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the Pope.

Now to Rome.

“Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in

the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting

parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures

which the clergy may adopt with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately

connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting

powers join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them,

and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations.” Article (3)

Treaty of Varona (1822)

If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being observed he must be

obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws

moreover become obligatory without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers.

Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional

ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the

Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown

that the Pope rules the world?

The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal

Bull of 1455 and 1492.

I could go on and on, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Don’t let this information scare you

because without it you cannot be free. You have to understand that all slavery and

freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and understand

that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are corporations that are nothing but

fictional entities that have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your

slavery was because you believed a lie.

 

The United States of America has been locked into a Babylonian economic system the extends from the blend of pagan Emperor Constantine and the Roman Catholic Church in 382 A.D., which is under the control of the King of England, who is owned by the Vatican per the Treaty of 1213.  In 1611, King James had the Bible translated into an official English version.  King James happened to be the most powerful Freemason in history, because he  ruled Scotland and England at the same time.   In 1776, the rebellion in the colonies was halted and the aristocrats were placed into “checkmate” by the Vatican, whose message was delivered by the King’s agents.  From that point until today, Americans have been taught a Myth about their own history, which holds them in slavery to the most powerful corporation on earth which resides in Rome, Italy.  Americans have been deliberately kept ignorant of the Truth.

QUESTION: Is the United States Constitution in effect today?

FACT:  President Bush II told the GOP leadership during a meeting about the Patriot Act in November of 2005:  QUOTE:”Stop throwing the Constitution in my face! It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

FACT:  Citizens feel like they are under siege from all branches of government.  They must pay taxes and fees that consume over 50% of their earned wages.  They formed the National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners of America to prevent the government from taking away firearms, which are supposedly protected under the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights. There is an invasion from Mexico that is ignored by the federal level, yet it is constitutionally mandated to protect the borders.

QUESTION:  Where are the Declaration of Independence and The United States Constitution physically located?

ANSWER: The Declaration of Independence is missing.

QUOTE:  In the Woman’s Day magazine, July 7, 2009, there is a box entitled, “Independence Day by the Numbers” which states: “25 = Number of copies of the Declaration of Independence known to exist.  (No originals with the famous signatures are known to remain.) END QUOTE

ANSWER:  The original handwritten copy of The United States Constitution, according to the National Archives and records Administration, QUOTE:  “ . .. Is on display at the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington, D.C.” END QUOTE

QUESTION:  Can Americans access all of their pubic documents?

ANSWER: No.

QUOTE: “2006 controversy over reclassification– In March 2006, it was revealed by the Archivist of the United States in a public hearing that a memorandum of understanding between Collins and various government agencies existed to ‘reclassify’, (i.e., withdraw from public access), certain documents in the name of national security, and to do so in a manner such that researchers would not be likely to discover the process. [SOURCE: gwu.edu (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20060411/index.htm) (2006-04-11)]

QUESTION: Was the entire creation of the United States of America a con job?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE from Edmond Burke in March 22, 1775 with his Speech on Conciliation with America:

“. . . Let the colonies always keep the idea of their civil rights associated with your government–they will cling and grapple to you, and no force under heaven will be of power to tear them from their allegiance.  But let it be once understood that your government may be one thing and their privileges another, that these two things may exist without any mutual relation–the cement is gone, the cohesion is loosened, and everything hastens to decay and dissolution.  As long as you have the wisdom to keep the sovereign authority of this country as the sanctuary of liberty, the sacred temple consecrated to our common faith, wherever the chosen race and sons of England worship freedom, they will turn their faces toward you.  The more they multiply, the more friends you will have, the more ardently they love liberty, the more perfect will be their obedience.  Slavery they can have; they can have it from Spain; they may have it from Prussia.  But until you become lost to all feeling of your true interest and your natural dignity, freedom they can have from none but you.  This commodity of price, of which you have the monopoly.  This is the true Act of Navigation, which binds to you the commerce of the colonies, and through them secures to you the wealth of the world.  Deny them this participation of freedom, and you break that sole bond which originally made, and must still preserve, the unity of the empire. . . Let us get an American revenue as we have got an American empire.  English privileges have made it all that it is; English privileges alone will make it all it can be.”

QUESTION:  Is there legal evidence that the Constitution did not apply to the American people at large from the very beginning?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE:

The Padleford Case

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach in the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. States are the parties to it.

Padleford, Fay & Co. v. The Mayor & Aldermen of the City of Savanna, 14 Ga 438, 520, S.C. Georgia (1854)

 

Interrogatories about the Constitution and American Law

 

 

QUOTE: “The reason why [deception cannot be forced on an Individual] is because deception has to be first created, then conveyed, and then accepted by others – then only can deception succeed.  Deception can only find fertility in a human mind to the extent that mind is receptive to it; similarly, in a sense, it actually takes two people to manufacture a successful lie: the first to utter the lie, and the second to accept it as such.”  –1985, Invisible Contracts, by  George Mercier.

1.  Who funded the grants for the land development in the original 13 Colonies?

ANSWER: There were several entities involved in exploring America, but the King of England was the point of contact. Other countries said that they had claim to lands; however, they were not clever enough to get the paperwork straight, nor were they strong enough to defend their legal Claim; hence, they lost both the legal and physical battle for occupation of America.

2.  What were the names,  founding dates, and connections to the King of England by the original 13 colonies?

[SOURCE: World Book Encyclopedia (WBE)]

 

ANSWER:

1067-Virginia – Charter by King to the Virginia Company of London

1620-Massachusetts – Charter granted by the King to the Puritans

1623-New Hampshire – King appointed Council of New England for settlement

1624-New York – Charter by King to Duke of York

1622-Connecticut – Charter by King to John Winthrop

1634-Maryland – Charter by King to Lord Baltimore

1636-Rhode Island – King granted “Charter of Rhode Island & Providence Plantations”

1638-Delaware – Charter by King to Duke of York

1643-Pennsylvania – Grant by King to William Penn

1653-North Carolina – Grant by King to Sir Robert Heath

1660-New Jersey – Grant by King to Duke of York

1670-South Carolina – Grant by King to Eight “Lords Proprietors”

1733-Georgia – Grant by King to a Corporation entitled:  “Trustees for Establishing the Colony of Georgia in America

3.  Who owned the colonies?

ANSWER: The legal contracting documents for the colonies were of three types, but all of them were under the direction of the King of England:

 

(a) royal – under the direct control of the King

(b) proprietary-under the control of a Proprietor, an appointed by the King

(c) corporate-under a charter obtained from the King of England by a company with stockholders. [SOURCE: WBE]

4.  Did each colony have its own form of government?

ANSWER: Each colony had a governor and a legislature; however, the King of England appointed the governor over the royal colonies.  In proprietary colonies, the King appointed the Proprietor, who appointed the governor.  In Connecticut and Rhode Island the people elected the governor; however, Connecticut was under the Fundamental Orders until it received a royal charter in 1662 and Rhode Island was under the English charter of 1663, which served as its constitution.  [SOURCE: WBE]

5.  Did the colonies have laws?

ANSWER: The laws that were passed by any of the colonial legislatures had to be approved by the English government.  Governors appointed by the King had the responsibility of carrying out his orders.  The King expected them to enforce the laws of England, especially acts of Parliament that regulated colonial trade.  [SOURCE:  WBE]

6.  Did Christopher Columbus discover and claim any of the original 13 colonies for Spain or Portugal?

ANSWER: No.  Columbus traveled around the areas of Jamaica, Costa Rica, Panama, etc. [SOURCE: WBE]

7.  What is a Commodity Exchange?

ANSWER: “Commodity exchanges are voluntary trade associations.  They are called organized markets, because all members must follow certain trading rules.  All business, for example, must be conducted on the trading floor within certain hours.  Rules set the commission (fee) that may be charged in a transaction, and the time within which payment must be made.” [SOURCE: WBE]

8.  Did the colonies have connections to a Commodity Exchange in England?

 

ANSWER: Yes, It was called the Board of Trade (1621-1970)

QUOTE:

URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

“The1621 Privy Council, directed by the King, ‘to take into their consideration, the true causes of the decay of trade and scarcity of coin within the Kingdom and to consult the means for the removing of these inconveniences.’  As a result a committee of inquiry was set up named ‘The Committee of Privy Council for Trade and Foreign Plantations’ (this is still the formal title of the ‘Board of Trade’) and this committee can be regarded as the germ of the Board of Trade.”

“Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, trade matters remained the responsibility of Privy Council Committees.  In 1696 William III set up a body of eight paid Commissioners ‘for promoting the trade of our Kingdom and for inspecting and improving our plantations in America and elsewhere.’”

9.  Does the word “plantation” mean a large farming enterprise?

ANSWER: No.  The definition found in Burke on Conciliation of the Colonies stated, “Plantations–colonies; the plantings of a new society or race.  The term is regularly so used in Acts and Charters, and has no reference whatever to cultivation of the soil.”

10.  Did the King of England operate on his own as a free agent in the creation of the colonies?

ANSWER: No.  The King of England was bound to the Treaty of 1213.  The following brief history explains who was actually in charge of the colonies.

 

QUOTE:

[ INTRO:  The King refused to accept Stephen Langton as the Archbishop of Canterbury by Pope Innocent III in 1208, and the King was excommunicated from the Catholic Church by the Pope for his disobedience to contractual agreements to the Crown.  The Pope and the King owed money to the Crown bankers, so the Pope had to reign in a naughty King in order to avoid default to The Crown.]

“Faced with defeat by the forces aligned against him by the Vatican, King John ran for cover, and sought to regain the support of the Pope.  He returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope, as vassals, swore submission and loyalty to him, accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and offered the Pope a vassal’s bond of fealty and homage, an annual tribute of 1,000 marks (equivalent to a bit more than 666 pounds sterling) and the return of the Church property he had seized when he had rebelled against it.

“Two months later, in July 1213, King John was: absolved of excommunication, at Winchester, by the return Arch Bishop of Canterbury Langton.

“Three months later, on October 3, 1213, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, who by virtue of his position as Vicar of Christ claims ownership of everything and everyone, on earth in the tradition of the Nazarene-Communist supercapitalist superdictatorship that is true fundamentalist Christianity.

“On April 21, 1214, the Pope, in Rome, formally accepted King John’s surrender of his kingdoms and his pledge of vassal (together with the moneys paid in tribute); and three months later, in July 1214, Pope Innocent III raised the interdict against the English.

“Thus the Pope assured the English of ‘access to Heaven,’ from which they had been ‘barred’ by their king’s opposition to the church’s Nazarene, or Communist, totalitarianism and denial of civil rights to mankind.”

[SOURCE: British Museum Publication G. R. C. Davis, entitled Magna Carta (211), and American Counsel of Christian Laymen: How Red is The Federal Counsel of Churches.]

 

Advertisements

I appreciate your comment. Thank you, <3

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s